Thursday, 22 March 2012

Simple is good - or is it?

Nature's perfect
complexity, seemingly
so simple...
Following on from the P.S. in my previous post on 21 March 2012 ("Interlude: Ode to pen and paper"), below is what I came across when googling "simple is good":

"Why do we assume that simple is good? Because with physical products, we have to feel we can dominate them. As you bring order to complexity, you find a way to make the product defer to you. Simplicity isn’t just a visual style. It’s not just minimalism or the absence of clutter. It involves digging through the depth of the complexity. To be truly simple, you have to go really deep. For example, to have no screws on something, you can end up having a product that is so convoluted and so complex. The better way is to go deeper with the simplicity, to understand everything about it and how it’s manufactured. You have to deeply understand the essence of a product in order to be able to get rid of the parts that are not essential." 
Source: A person named John Ive quoting Steve Jobs on Minimalmac.com, http://minimalmac.com/post/15549379076/why-do-we-assume-that-simple-is-good-because-with (accessed 21/03/2012)

This statement is intriguing to me as it makes me slightly uncomfortable and at the same time I find it very profound. 

"Why do we assume that simple is good? Because with physical products, we have to feel we can dominate them. As you bring order to complexity, you find a way to make the product defer to you." 
Yes, without a doubt we want to control the products we produce and we want them to be straightforward (i.e. simple) to control, especially IT equipment like a Mac. Where would we be at if we couldn't? Maybe in a world like in the movies iRobot or Tron... . Very few, if any of us, would want that.

However, at a broader level, I think Jobs (like all of us, including myself!) has been a little careless with the meaning of 'good' in the expression 'simple is good'. We should ask ourselves whether dominating something, in this case 'making something simple', truly is a 'good' thing. 'Good' in what way? Convenient and easy perhaps, but 'good' in an ethical sense or from the point of view of happiness? 

  • Why simple = not good: 
What makes me uncomfortable about this statement is that it highlights how our desire to dominate physical products extends to our environment more generally, including other people and nature. This desire is rooted in a dualistic, imperialistic view of the world, which does not always (or dare I say ever) work to our advantage: 'us versus them', 'dominator versus dominated', 'conqueror versus conquered', 'usurper versus usurped', 'opposites versus complements' ... 'humans versus the environment'. Now tell me, where is the joy and celebration of life in those words and situations? Perhaps we are ignoring the mystery that is the vital complexity in our lives and we are thereby oversimplifying some things ... .

How does a world of myriads of complex, mysteriously interwoven possibilities sound to you? Does it instill a sense of awe and even - if you dare to admit it - a spark of excitement in you? It does in me! I think that we as humans make up this world of possibilities and connections. We are all interwoven with nature and this entire world - to an extent that is too complex for us to grasp, or in other words, to simplify.  

"We are all made of stardust" - magical, isn't it? 
By the way, if you are interested in reading more about us and stardust, see http://www.physicscentral.com/explore/poster-stardust.cfm for a starting point.

  • Why, on the other hand, simple = good: 
"Simplicity [...] involves digging through the depth of the complexity. To be truly simple, you have to go really deep. [...] You have to deeply understand the essence of a product in order to be able to get rid of the parts that are not essential." 
Wow, this is a powerful statement. All I can say is: Imagine applying this to yourself as a person! SIMPLY replace the words "a product" with "yourself"... I will say no more, except this:

  • Conclusion: 
Simple is truly good, when it uncovers the essence and joy in/of life, and rids us of our clutter. 
BUT, oh humanity, beware of oversimplifying! Oversimplify at your own peril...

5 comments:

  1. This article about natural architecture that "coincidentally" (though I don't like to use that word anymore) came across today is an excellent complement to my above post!
    http://www.designboom.com/contemporary/naturalarchitecture.html (Have a look a the photos!)

    Here is an excerpt/the beginning of it:
    "The natural environment still manages to fill us with a sense of awe and amazement. despite the amount of scientific knowledge mankind has gathered, nature still holds great mysteries that we may never be able to unravel. this complexity has continually daunted man. in frustration, we try to control nature by enforcing order. as a result, we have distanced ourselves from the earth, even though our survival is completely dependent on it. we are now trying to regain our close connection to nature.
    there is an emerging art movement that is exploring mankind's desire to reconnect to the earth, through the built environment. referred to as 'natural architecture', it aims to create a new, more harmonious, relationship between man and nature by exploring what it means to design with nature in mind."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amazing photos, Vivian! Amazing art! Amazing nature!
      Are you aware of Wang Shu? He has been awarded the 2012 Pritzger Prize (apparently the Nobel Prize of architecture).
      "Some of Wang's notable design accomplishments include salvaging more than two million tiles from demolished traditional houses to cover the roofs of Xingshan Campus buildings. He designed half the Library of Wenzheng College underground because Suzhou gardening traditions suggest that buildings located between water and mountains should not be prominent." Huff Post March 22, 2012
      Respect for nature AND culture. What we need so much more of.
      <3 M <3

      Delete
    2. P.S. How about "co-incidentally"??
      <3M<3

      Delete
  2. Where is the Tree? I want to sit under its branches to contemplate what you have written!!
    <3M<3

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was having trouble getting the blog to look the way I wanted it to with the tree... Hopefully I will be able to bring it back!

      Delete